Re: Yet another sendmail exploit
From djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein)
Organization IR
Date 26 Nov 1996 19:14:22 GMT
Newsgroups comp.security.unix,comp.mail.misc
Message-ID <1996Nov2619.14.22.1248@koobera.math.uic.edu>
References 1 2 3 4
Trever Miller <bug@cyberdex.cuug.ab.ca> wrote:
> You mean 50%, right?
That's a matter of interpretation. It's not unreasonable to exclude
connection failures from the tally; this weights servers by (late night)
reachability.
Anyway, I've done a second survey. Here are the results.
The InterNIC zone files contain 842937 different domains, counting both
the 2LDs and the glue, as of mid-November 1996.
I did an MX (falling back to A) lookup for each domain, obtaining 134601
different IP addresses. I excluded 0.*, 10.*, and 127.*. I did not retry
apparent soft failures. Note that these 134601 addresses do not entirely
include the 48419 IP addresses listed in the InterNIC zone files.
I tried connecting to port 25 at each address.
28043 connection attempts did not produce a greeting message:
10158 timed out
9044 connection refused
4930 host unreachable
3500 network unreachable
404 immediate disconnect
4 operation not supported
1 connection reset
1 protocol not available
1 machine not on network
106558 produced a greeting message. Most hosts responded to HELP. I have
a script to guess what server is running; here are the results:
69146 Sendmail
5366 not sure
5075 Post.Office
4575 NT Mail
2982 MS Exchange
2457 Netscape Mail Server
2188 AIMS
1912 smap
1361 SLmail
1323 Smail 3.1
1230 IMS SMTP Receiver
1220 IMail
720 MMDF
665 Zmailer
650 EMWAC SMTP Receiver
638 ``The normal sequence of events in sending a message'' (?)
615 GroupWise
516 PMDF
503 MetaInfo Sendmail
404 Lotus SMTP MTA
366 Connect2-SMTP
357 Worldgroup SMTP server
315 Generic SMTP Handler (Raptor firewall)
294 TGV/MultiNet
225 qmail
218 ``Simple Mail Transfer Service Ready'' (?)
180 VMS MX
173 AltaVista Mail
118 PP
112 MailSite SMTP Receiver
105 IBM VM SMTP
96 UCX
91 ``Help ... Not recognized'' (?)
82 SMTPXD
71 MailShare
67 SMTP-OpenVMS
44 NASTA Gate
41 Exim
24 CommuniGate SMTPGate
21 ListSTAR
12 Pony Express
Here's how the guesses work:
/Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Connector/ { ++exchange; next }
/NT Server running Internet Shopper/ { ++ntmail; next }
/Simple Mail Transfer Service Ready/ { ++smtsrfoo; next }
/send comments to qmail@pobox.com/ { ++qmail; next }
/CommuniGate SMTPGate is ready/ { ++communigate; next }
/Apple Internet Mail Server/ { ++aims; next }
/post.office E-mail system/ { ++postoffice; next }
/TGV.MultiNet SMTP server/ { ++tgv; next }
/MailSite SMTP Receiver/ { ++mailsite; next }
/Worldgroup SMTP server/ { ++worldgroup; next }
/Generic SMTP handler/ { ++raptor; next }
/Netscape Mail Server/ { ++netscape; next }
/EMWAC SMTP Receiver/ { ++emwac; next }
/GroupWise SMTP.MIME/ { ++groupwise; next }
/MetaInfo Sendmail/ { ++metainfo; next }
/IMS SMTP Receiver/ { ++ims; next }
/running MailShare/ { ++mailshare; next }
/ListSTAR Package/ { ++liststar; next }
/TGV MultiNet V/ { ++tgv; next }
/AltaVista Mail/ { ++avmail; next }
/Lotus SMTP MTA/ { ++lotus; next }
/MX V.\..-. VAX/ { ++vmsmx; next }
/post.office v/ { ++postoffice; next }
/Connect2-SMTP/ { ++connect2; next }
/MX V.\.. VAX/ { ++vmsmx; next }
/MX V.\.. AXP/ { ++vmsmx; next }
/Zachariassen/ { ++zmailer; next }
/Pony Express/ { ++pony; next}
/SMTP.OpenVMS/ { ++openvms; next }
/IBM VM SMTP/ { ++ibmvm; next }
/NASTA Gate/ { ++nasta; next }
/SMTP.smap/ { ++smap; next }
/Smail3.1/ { ++smail31; next }
/SLmail95/ { ++slmail; next }
/SLmailNT/ { ++slmail; next }
/SLMAILNT/ { ++slmail; next }
/Sendmail/ { ++sendmail; next }
/PMDF V/ { ++pmdf; next }
/SMTPXD/ { ++smtpxd; next }
/IMail/ { ++imail; next }
/Exim/ { ++exim; next }
/UCX / { ++ucx; next }
/The normal sequence of events in sending a message/ { ++normalfoo; next }
/[pP][pP].*Pleased to meet you/ { ++pp; next }
/Help \.\.\. Not recognized/ { ++helpfoo; next }
/For more info use .HELP/ { ++sendmail; next }
/unimplemented..#5.5.1/ { ++qmail; next }
/Complaints.bugs to/ { ++mmdf; next }
The average time to handle one address was under 8 seconds; not counting
initial connection timeouts, 3.78 seconds. I used a concurrency of 250.
I expect my next survey, using the NW list of 13 million hosts, to run a
bit more slowly.
---Dan
Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail. http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html